![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() It's not a question of believing the job exists because there's a real need to optimize the visuals. >do you really believe that or does your job depending on you and others, believing that? More background in recent article here on 40 years of processor performance: He cited Moore's 1975 revision as a precedent for the current deceleration, which results from technical challenges and is "a natural part of the history of Moore's law." Brian Krzanich, CEO of Intel, announced, "Our cadence today is closer to two and a half years than two." Intel is expected to reach the 10 nm node in 2018, a three-year cadence. Intel stated in 2015 that the pace of advancement has slowed, starting at the 22 nm feature width around 2012, and continuing at 14 nm. For example, the 2010 update to the International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, predicted that growth would slow around 2013, and in 2015 Gordon Moore foresaw that the rate of progress would reach saturation: "I see Moore's law dying here in the next decade or so." In general, it is not logically sound to extrapolate from the historical growth rate into the indefinite future. Although the rate held steady from 1975 until around 2012, the rate was faster during the first decade. Moore's law is an observation and projection of an historical trend and not a physical or natural law. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |